The Supreme Court has allowed the use of pellet guns in exceptional circumstances. This decision follows a petition against their deployment during a protest on July 20, 2026 . The protest concerned the NEET UG re-exam.
Pellet Gun Use in Protests
The petition questioned the use of pump-action guns by the Rapid Action Force (RAF). Seven rounds of pellets were fired in Delhi's Connaught Place. Protesters demanded the Education Minister's resignation over the NEET paper leak.
The Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, stressed non-violence. They emphasized peaceful expression of dissatisfaction with government policy. The petition argued pellet guns violate Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution. This article guarantees the right to assemble peacefully.
Court's Stance and Concerns
A complete ban on pellet guns faced skepticism. Justice Joymalya Bagchi suggested standardizing police defensive gear. Helmets and shields are crucial for frontline officers during agitations.
Justice Bagchi noted, "We are completely in agreement with pleas of no-violence principle when it comes to agitation of students or persons expressing dissatisfaction with a government policy." He added concerns about "elements hijacking students' protests." Such protests can serve ulterior purposes or be sabotaged.
Medical Treatment Ordered
The court also urged the Delhi government to provide comprehensive medical treatment. This is for Mr. Singh, who sustained injuries during the protest.
