A parliamentary committee has sharply criticized the National Testing Agency (NTA) over the Common University Entrance Test (CUET). The panel specifically questioned the reliance on Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) for humanities and arts subjects. They argue this format hinders critical thinking. The committee demands a reform roadmap from the NTA. This comes after repeated technical failures and security breaches in national examinations.
MCQ Format Criticized for Humanities
The parliamentary panel stated MCQs do not accurately assess skills needed for humanities. Subjects like history and literature require analysis. The current format encourages memorization over understanding. This disadvantages students who excel in subjective evaluation.
Arts disciplines traditionally assess students through essays, arguments, and context. The MCQ format neglects these communication and analytical abilities. The committee noted this format can also favor students with access to specialized coaching.
NTA Faces Calls for Reform
The parliamentary committee expressed dissatisfaction with the NTA. Recurring paper leaks and exam disruptions were highlighted. The committee issued a list of required improvements for national testing systems.
Key demands include a fixed timeline for security upgrades. Mandatory third-party cybersecurity audits are also required. The NTA is urged to explore alternative question formats. These could include descriptive or hybrid styles for humanities.
Decentralization of examination procedures is another recommendation. This aims to improve the management and security of national tests. The Ministry of Education is tasked with ensuring the NTA implements these reforms.
