A district court has ordered the Delhi Police to file a First Information Report (FIR) against two Delhi University (DU) professors. The professors are accused of cheating and fraud in a case involving fake research paper publications. The court’s directive came after a complaint from Ankita Kilsen, a former assistant professor at Bharati College.
Allegations of Fake Publications
Kilsen alleges the professors took ₹1 lakh from her. She claims they promised to publish her research papers in reputable journals. Instead, the publications were found to be fake. Kilsen used these publications to secure her teaching position.
An inquiry under the Right to Information (RTI) Act revealed the papers were not genuine. This led to Kilsen’s job termination. Certificates provided by the accused for these publications were also found to be fraudulent.
Introduction and Financial Transaction
Kilsen stated she met Sanjeev Kumar, a medical officer at AIIMS Delhi, in May 2021. She later met DU professors Pramod Kumar and Luke Khanna in December 2021. Khanna was an assistant professor at Bharati College at the time.
In May 2022, the professors reportedly advised Kilsen on the necessity of published research for an assistant professor role. They allegedly collected ₹1 lakh in cash from her for publication and travel expenses.
Between July and December 2022, Pramod Kumar and Luke Khanna provided Kilsen with three research papers. They also supplied publication certificates. Pramod Kumar was listed as a co-author on one of the papers, reinforcing Kilsen's belief in their authenticity.
Job Application and Termination
In February 2023, the professors allegedly assisted Kilsen with her application for an assistant professor position. She was selected for the role at Bharati College, University of Delhi, on November 23.
On August 8, 2024, the Principal of Bharati College informed Kilsen about the fake journals. This followed an RTI inquiry. Kilsen received a show-cause notice and was subsequently terminated from her position.
Court's Reasoning for FIR
The court emphasized the need for an FIR due to the ₹1 lakh paid in cash. The court noted the presence of fraudulent intent. It stated that fabricating false documents and supplying fake certificates indicated a dishonest and fraudulent state of mind by all three accused.
