The Bar Council of India (BCI) reversed its decision to ban NALSAR University law graduates from enrolling in state councils. This change affects the class of 2026. The reversal came after Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant questioned the BCI's initial ban. The BCI had imposed the ban following student protests related to CJI Kant's participation in a NALSAR convocation ceremony. The BCI initially stated it would ban students involved in the protests. However, the council later announced the ban was lifted. They cited that most students were innocent and did not intend to participate in the campaign. CJI Kant reportedly stated that students have a right to protest. He also indicated that the matter was between him and the students. The BCI had requested reports from NALSAR's Vice Chancellor on students involved in the campaign. BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra announced the proceedings were closed. He attributed the decision to the majority of students being innocent. The BCI also considered reactions from the legal community and the public.
Background of the NALSAR Campaign
The online campaign began after CJI Kant made remarks regarding NEET student protests in Delhi. NALSAR students reportedly opposed CJI Kant's participation in their convocation. The BCI’s decision to ban all graduates, rather than only those involved, drew criticism. The matter reportedly reached the Supreme Court. CJI Kant questioned the BCI's intervention in the issue. He expressed displeasure with the ban. CJI Kant also shared his experiences as an active student. NALSAR students can now proceed with enrollment. The situation has raised questions about BCI's authority over state council enrollments. It also highlights discussions on institutional decorum and student-judiciary relations.
